Case Law › High Court › Wp/2246/2013 Of M/S. Vicky Realtors v. T...

Wp/2246/2013 Of M/S. Vicky Realtors v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 29 Jan 2015 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

29 Jan 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/2246/2013 Of M/S. Vicky Realtors v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 2246 of 2013 Date: 29.01.2015 Between: M/s. Vicky Realtors,Hyderabad. … Petitioner And The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 2246 of 2013 ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this matter has become infructuous. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as such. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ Date: 29.01.2015ES ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.