Case LawHigh Court › Wp/22573/2009 Of Pvp Ventures Ltd., A Co...

Wp/22573/2009 Of Pvp Ventures Ltd., A Company Incorporated Under v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax

High Court 10 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/22573/2009 Of Pvp Ventures Ltd., A Company Incorporated Under v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/22573/2009 Of Pvp Ventures Ltd., A Company Incorporated Under v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH:AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARIAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.22573 OF 2009 Between: PVP Ventures Limited,Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,Rep. by its Vice President (Finance)Mr. Deepak Nagori AND ..... Petitioner The Assistant Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)-II,Income Tax Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad and others. .....Respondents THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MEENA KUMARIANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.22573OF 2009 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. __________________ T. MEENA KUMARI, J March 10, 2010. KTL ___________________________ NOOTY RAMA MOHANA RAO, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan