Case LawHigh Court › Wp/22762/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Bev...

Wp/22762/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 14 Aug 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/22762/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
14 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/22762/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage ofadmission.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINIand THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.22762 OF 2013 Dated: 14.08.2013 Between: M/s. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Limited …..Petitioner And The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Hyderabad Bench-B, Hyderabad, rep. byIts Registrar and others …..Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINIandTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.22762 OF 2013 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini) Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 28.3.2013 for theassessment year 2006-07 the writ petitioner preferred an appealbefore the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘B’. Along with the appeal, the petitioner also filed an application for stay ofthe order dated 28.03.2013. The said application was dismissed bythe Appellate Tribunal by the impugned order dated 28.06.2013. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. Though various contentions have been advanced by thelearned counsel for the parties on merits of the case, having regard tothe fact that the main appeal is pending before the Appellate Tribunal,it is neither necessary nor proper for this Court to express any opinionon merits of the case at this stage. Moreover, it is brought to our notice that as a matter of fact, themain appeal has already been listed before the Tribunal below on12.08.2013 and from 12.08.2013, it was adjourned to 02.09.2013. Hence, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petitionwith a direction to the Tribunal below to hear and dispose of the mainappeal itself expeditiously. Learned counsel appearing for both theparties agreed that they would co-operate for expeditious disposal ofthe appeal without seeking any adjournments. However, in view of the apprehension expressed by the learnedSpecial Government Pleader appearing for the writ petitioner that the respondents 2 and 3 may initiate coercive steps for recovery of thedisputed tax even before the appeal is heard and decided, thepetitioner is hereby granted liberty to institute appropriate proceedingsafresh in case necessity thereof arises. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage ofadmission. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in thiswrit petition shall stand closed. _____________ G.ROHINI, J _____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date : 14.08.2013ssp
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan