Case LawHigh Court › Wp/22825/2006 Of Assistant Director Of I...

Wp/22825/2006 Of Assistant Director Of Income Tax ( Exemptions)-Iii v. Commissionerof Income Tax ( Appeals)-V

High Court 18 Jan 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/22825/2006 Of Assistant Director Of Income Tax ( Exemptions)-Iii v. Commissionerof Income Tax ( Appeals)-V
Date of order
18 Jan 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/22825/2006 Of Assistant Director Of Income Tax ( Exemptions)-Iii v. Commissionerof Income Tax ( Appeals)-V, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIand THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.22824, 22825, 22871 and 23254 of 2006 W.P.No.22824 of 2006Between: DATED:18.01.2007 Agricultural Market Committee. ..Petitioner AndThe Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad andothers. ..RespondentsW.P.No.22825 of 2006Between:Agricultural Market Committee. ..Petitioner AndAssistant Director of Indome Tax, Hyderabad andothers. ..RespondentsW.P.No.22871 of 2006Between:Agricultural Market Committee. ..Petitioner AndUnion of India, New Delhi. and others. ..RespondentsW.P.No.23254 of 2006Between:Agricultural Market Committee. ..Petitioner AndUnion of India and others. ..Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIand THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.22824, 22825, 22871 and 23254 of 2006 COMMON ORDER: (per BN,J) These writ petitions have been filed challenging theassessments made under the Income Tax Act on various grounds. During the course of hearing, it was stated that in some of thecases, appeals have already been filed before the appellateauthorities, which are pending. It is further submitted that in one of thecases, the appeal was dismissed and a further appeal is pendingbefore the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Since the petitioners haveefficacious remedy available and in some of the cases, appeals havealready been filed, therefore, we decline to admit these writ petitions. The petitioners are at liberty to file appeals in those matters in whichappeals have not been filed so far. They are also at liberty to movestay applications before the appellate authority. In some matterswhere appeals have been filed and are pending, the appellateauthorities are directed to dispose of the appeals expeditiously. The Writ Petitions are accordingly dismissed. There shall be noorder as to costs. ________________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) Dt.18.01.2007. _____________________________ (NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan