Case Law › High Court › Wp/22979/2011 Of M/S. Swayam Consultancy...

Wp/22979/2011 Of M/S. Swayam Consultancy (P) Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 25 Nov 2011 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

25 Nov 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/22979/2011 Of M/S. Swayam Consultancy (P) Ltd v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 271 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 22979 OF 2009 DATED:25-11-2011 Between: M/s. Swayam Consultancy (P) Ltd., rep., by its Managing Director, SriSwayam Prakash Jee, S/o. Late Dr. Shivajee, aged about 62 years, PlotNOs. 101 & 102, EPIP, Pashamylaram (V), Patancheru (M), MedakDistrict … Petitioner And The Income Tax Officer, Ward No.3 (2), Hyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 22979 OF 2011 ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The order passed by the respondent under Section 271 (1) (c) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 is admittedly appealable. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thiswrit petition with liberty to file an appeal. 3. Leave and liberty granted. The writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. 4. The miscellaneous application is also dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The appeal be filed by the petitioner within two weeks. MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ 25-11-2011 SANJAY KUMAR, J ks Writ Petition No. 22979 of 2011 Page 1 of 1

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.