Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2313/2010 Of Hdfc Bank Limited v. The...

Wp/2313/2010 Of Hdfc Bank Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2(3) And 2 Ors

High Court 14 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2313/2010 Of Hdfc Bank Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2(3) And 2 Ors
Date of order
14 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2004-05, 2003-04
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/2313/2010 Of Hdfc Bank Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2(3) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: Similar notice issued by the assessing officer to the same assessee seeking to reopen the assessment for AY 2003-04 on similar grounds has been quashed by this Court by allowing Writ Petition No.2312 of 2010 today i.e.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2313 OF 2010 HDFC Bank Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax 2(3) & Ors...Respondents. Mr. J.D. Mistri, senior Advocate i/b. Mr. A.K. Jasani for the petitionerMr. Vimal Gupta with Padma Divakar for respondents. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.S. DALVI, JJ. DATED : 14TH MARCH, 2011 P.C. :- 1.Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent, the petition is taken up for final hearing. 2.This Writ Petition is filed to challenge the notice dated 30/3/2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessment for AY 2004-05 and also to challenge the order dated 19/10/2010 whereby the objections raised by the petitioner for reopening the assessment have been rejected. 3.Admittedly, the assessment in the present case is sought to be reopened beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Similar notice issued by the assessing officer to the same assessee seeking to reopen the assessment for AY 2003-04 on similar grounds has been quashed by this Court by allowing Writ Petition No.2312 of 2010 today i.e. 14/03/2011. For the reasons stated therein, the notice dated 30/3/2010 as well as the order dated 19/10/2010 which are subject matter of the present Writ Petition are quashed and set aside. 4.Rule is made absolute in the above terms with no order as to costs. (SMT. R.S. DALVI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan