In Wp/2316/2023 Of Tata Communications Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 3 1 Mumbai, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYDigitallysigned byPURTIORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2024.04.1816:05:27+0530WRIT PETITION NO. 2316 OF 2023
WRIT PETITION NO. 2316 OF 2023
Tata Communications Limited
V/s.The Deputy Commissioner of IncomeTax – 1(3)(1), Mumbai and Ors.
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. Anil R. Wani a/w Ms. Supriya S. Devergudi and Ms. Urvi Wani forPetitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATED : 16[th] APRIL 2024
P.C. :
1.Mr. Wani states that reliefs that were sought in this petition
have worked out and therefore nothing will survive in the petition.
2.Petition disposed.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.