Wp/23181/2021 Of M/S The Abraham Memorial Educational Trsut v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/23181/2021 Of M/S The Abraham Memorial Educational Trsut v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/23181/2021 Of M/S The Abraham Memorial Educational Trsut v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signedbyMARIGANGAIAHPREMAKUMARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
-WRIT PETITION NO. 23181 OF 2021 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. THE ABRAHAM MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST SINGENA AGRAHARA VIA HUSKUR ROAD APMC YARD, HUSKUR PO, ELECTRICITY CITY, PHASE 2 BENGALURU - 560 099 (REPRESENTED BY ITS TRUSTEE JESUS SUDHIR LALL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O SUDHIR MADHAVJI LALL)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TATA KRISHNA, ADV.)
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) 6 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, P KALINGA RAO ROAD, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. (EXEMPTIONS) 6 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, P KALINGA RAO ROAD, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) 6 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, P KALINGA RAO ROAD, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027. (EXEMPTIONS) 6 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, P KALINGA RAO ROAD, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) 6 FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING, ANNEXE, P KALINGA RAO ROAD, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAVI RAJ Y. V., ADV.)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AS FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN ORDER OR OTHERWISE THE IMPUGNED REVIEW ORDER, DATED 26.03.2019 PASSED BY THE R1, ENCLOSED IN ANNEXURE-A; QUASH AS FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN ORDER OR OTHERWISE THE IMPUGNED REVIEW ORDER, DATED 01.04.2019 PASSED BY THE R1, ENCLOSED IN ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel Sri.Tata Krishna for petitioner files
memo dated 05.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
(S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
NC CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue