Case Law › High Court › Wp/23562/2009 Of Visaka Industries Ltd v...

Wp/23562/2009 Of Visaka Industries Ltd v. The Deputy Commissionr Of Income Tax

High Court 29 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

29 Mar 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/23562/2009 Of Visaka Industries Ltd v. The Deputy Commissionr Of Income Tax, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to thepetitioner to file an appeal in accordance with law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.4189 OF 2009 DATED 29THMARCH, 2010 BETWEEN B.Sivaprasad … Petitioner and The Special Director,Directorate of Enforcement,Government of India,6[th] Floor, Lok Nayak Bhavan,Khan Market,New Delhi. And Others … Respondents THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.4189 OF 2009 ORDER: (Per TMK,J) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of thisCourt to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a statutory appeal. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to thepetitioner to file an appeal in accordance with law. No costs. _____________________________SMT. T.MEENA KUMARI, J. 29 MARCH, 2010.VGSR/PGS ________________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.