Wp/23647/2011 Of M/S.sree Rayalseema Green Energy Limited v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii
High Court
23 Nov 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/23647/2011 Of M/S.sree Rayalseema Green Energy Limited v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii
Date of order
23 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/23647/2011 Of M/S.sree Rayalseema Green Energy Limited v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 23647 OF 2011
DATED:23-11-2011
Between:
M/s. Sree Rayalseema Green Energy Limited, having its Regd. Office atH.No.1-10-19, Street No.3, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad – 500020, rep., byits Managing Director Shri K. Madhusudhan and two others
… Petitioners
And
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-III, 9[th] Floor, “C” Block, I.T Towers,A.C Guards, Hyderabad – 500004 and four others
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 23647 OF 2011
ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw thiswrit petition.
2. Leave is granted. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. The miscellaneous application is also dismissed as withdrawn.
MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ
23-11-2011
SANJAY KUMAR, J
ks
Writ Petition No. 23647 of 2011 Page 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.