In Wp/2365/2003 Of Shankar Sharma v. S. A. Mirajkar Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Considering the joint motion made by the parties to the petition, the petition stands disposed of in terms of the minutes of order with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2364 OF 2003
Devina Mehra .. Petitioner.
V/s.
S.A. Mirajkar, Asstt.
Commissioner of Income Tax
& Others .. Respondents.
WRIT PETITION NO.2365 OF 2003
Shankar Sharma .. Petitioner.
V/s.
S.A. Mirajkar, Asstt.
Commissioner of Income Tax
& Others .. Respondents.
Mr.S.K. Sen with Mr.Kedar Dighe i/b. Mr.V.S.
Khanavkar for the petitioner.
Mr.Parag Vyas for the respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH OCTOBER, 2005.
P.C. :
1. Parties to the petition have presented
minutes of order dated October 11, 2005 signed by the
advocates appearing for the respective parties. The
same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
identification. Both parties prayed that the
petition be disposed of in terms of the said minutes
of order.
2. Considering the joint motion made by the
parties to the petition, the petition stands disposed
of in terms of the minutes of order with no order as
to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue