Case Law › High Court › Wp/23669/2018 Of M/S Suresh Kumar Kothar...

Wp/23669/2018 Of M/S Suresh Kumar Kothari-Huf v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 07 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

07 Aug 2019

Assessment year(s)

2015-2016

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/23669/2018 Of M/S Suresh Kumar Kothari-Huf v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The petitioner has not)apprised this Court whether he has complied with thecontents of the communication or not.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 143 case law →

IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU| DATKBD THIS THE 0 DAY OF AUGUST, 2019. BEFORE| THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.23669 OF 2018 (TIT) Between: M/s.Suresh Kumar Kothari-HUF|Represented by its KartaMr.Suresh Kumar Kothari,»/o Punamchand Kothari,Aged about 409 years,Residing at No.O1, Omkar Vihar,9S.B.Road, V.V.Puram,Bengaluru — 560 O04.| ...Petitioner (By Sri.Dilraj Rohit Sequeira, Advocate-Absent) And: The Income Jax OfficerWard — 9 (2) (3), BMTC Complex,B["-]Floor, No.306,Koramangala, 6[($]Block,Bengaluru — 560 O95.| ...Respondent This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 oftConstitution of India, praying to quash the impugned|assessment order passed by the respondent under| section 143 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated|28.12.2017 for the assessment year 2015-2016 vide|Annexure-A and etc. This Writ Petition is coming on for Preliminaryhearing, this day, the Court made the following:-_ ORDER Matter called twice. None appears for thepetitioner. Petitioner has questioned the validity of thedemand notice for the assessment year 2015-2016 vide |Annexure-A along with Annexure-E dated 28.12.2017.By virtue of notice dated 28.12.2017 (Annexure-EF)petitioner was communicated to appear before theIncome|Tax|Officer,Ward-9(2)(3),BengaluruOT)29.01.2018 at 12.30 P.M. The petitioner has not)apprised this Court whether he has complied with thecontents of the communication or not. That apart there)is no interim order against Annexures — A and E. Prima)facie it is evident that the writ petition is premature. �00'"-),16/��($#�D")(�+#()()',� (&,- �-) %) #-�& �,'(�%&),(&),&.6#�� !"�#��

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.