Case LawHigh Court › Wp/23671/2018 Of Mr Devichand Kothari v....

Wp/23671/2018 Of Mr Devichand Kothari v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 11 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/23671/2018 Of Mr Devichand Kothari v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
2015-2016
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/23671/2018 Of Mr Devichand Kothari v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: ORDER Three days time is granted to comply with office objection, failing which the writ petition stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT -WRIT PETITION NO.23671 /2018 (TIT) BETWEEN MR DEVICHAND KOTHARI S/O PUNAMCHAND KOTHARI, AGED ABOUNT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.01, OMKAR VIHAR, S.B.ROAD, V.V.PURAM, BANGALORE-04 …PETITIONER/S (BY SRI./SMT.: DILRAJ ROHIT SEQUIERA, ADVOCATE) AND THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-5(2)(1), BMTC COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, NO.305, KORAMANGALA, 6TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560095 …RESPONDENT/S THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 DATED 26.12.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016 VIDE ANNX-A. QUASH THE PENALTY NOTICE DATED 26.12.2017 UNDER SECTION 271(1) (C) READ WITH SECTION 274 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 VIDE ANNX-E. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO GIVE A FAIR OPPORTUNITY FOR CROSS-EXAMINING THE WITNESSES BY THE PETITIONER. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. ORDER Three days time is granted to comply with office objection, failing which the writ petition stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : JK COMPARED BY : JK Sd/- JUDGE COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan