Wp/23672/2018 Of Mrs Jayshreedevi Kothari v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
11 Sep 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/23672/2018 Of Mrs Jayshreedevi Kothari v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
11 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
2015-2016
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/23672/2018 Of Mrs Jayshreedevi Kothari v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence,| petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATED THIS THER 1[‘T]DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE|
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI W.P. No.23672/2018
BETWEEN:
MRS. JAYSHRBBEDEVI KOTHARIW/O. SURESH KUMAR KOTHARIAGED ABOUT 42 YEARSRESIDING AT NO.O1,.OMKAR VIHAR, 8.B. ROAD,V.V. PURAM,BANGALORE — 560 OO4_.. PHTITIONE(BY SRI DILRAJ ROHIT SEQUIERA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) |
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD — 5}2| [3], BMTC COMPLEX,, FLOOR, NO.306,KORAMANGALA, 6 BLOCK, |BANGALORE —- 560 095... RESPONDENT|THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND22 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE|IMPUGNEDASSESSMENTORDERPASSEDBY|THE.RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 143 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 DTD 28.12.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-2016|VIDE ANNX-A AND BIC.THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,|THER COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING :ORDEROn 6.8.2019, the following order was passed:
“MattercalledTWICE.Noneappcals.Adjourned by four weeks.
Petitioner has to apprise this Court “Whetherhe has statutory remedy before the AppellateAuthority or not? On the next date of|hearing.”
Even today the matter was called twice, there is
no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence,|
petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Bkm
sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue