Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2372/2007 Of Vivek Gupta v. Income Ta...

Wp/2372/2007 Of Vivek Gupta v. Income Tax Settlement Commissione And Anr

High Court 23 Jun 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2372/2007 Of Vivek Gupta v. Income Tax Settlement Commissione And Anr
Date of order
23 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/2372/2007 Of Vivek Gupta v. Income Tax Settlement Commissione And Anr, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Digitally IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYsigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARAB ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPARABDate:2023.06.2711:13:37+0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 2372 OF 2007 Vivek Gupta V/s.Income Tax Settlement Commission and Anr. ….Petitioner …Respondents ---- Mr. Arjun Gupta for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. DATED : 23[rd] JUNE 2023 P.C. : 1.On 18[th] January 2023 this court states that Interim Settlement Board constituted under Section 245 AA of The Finance Act, has beendirected to consider petitioner’s case. Counsel for petitioner states that thematter was listed before the Board some time ago but the Board has notheard the matter. 2.The Board may go ahead and dispose petitioner’s application inaccordance with law. We also noted that the matter being before theInterim Board for settlement, Mr. Gupta states petitioner is not challengingthe constitutional validity of any of the provisions, in view of the directionsto the Interim Board to dispose petitioner’s application. 3. We also note that while Rule was issued on 3[rd] December 2007 this court had also granted the stay. The Settlement Commission had beendirected not to treat the application filed by petitioner as having abated.Since the Settlement Board has already been directed to consider theapplication, issue of abatement of the application would not arise. 4.Petition disposed. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan