Case Law › High Court › Wp/2385/2006 Of Siemens Information Syst...

Wp/2385/2006 Of Siemens Information Systems Ltd. Mumbai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 (2), Mumbai And 2 Ors

High Court 03 Jul 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/2385/2006 Of Siemens Information Systems Ltd. Mumbai v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-7 (2), Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2385 OF 2006 Siemens Information Systems Ltd. ..Appellant V/s. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent. Mr.P.J.Pardiwala with Atul Jasani for petitioner. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for respondent. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDR.V.MORE, JJ. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND R.V.MORE, JJ. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. DATED : 3RD JULY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- The issue raised in this petition is similar to what was the issue in Writ Petition No.2384 of 2006 which has been disposed of by us by Judment today. The assessment period is 2000-2001. For the reasons set out in the Judgment, this petition has to be allowed. In the result, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Petiion is disposed of. (F.I.REBELL0, J.) (F.I.REBELL0, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.