Wp/23912/2021 Of Smt Subhas Sharmila v. Income-Tax Officer
High Court
09 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/23912/2021 Of Smt Subhas Sharmila v. Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
09 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/23912/2021 Of Smt Subhas Sharmila v. Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 9[TH|]DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022BEFORE.
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV|
$WRIT PETITION No.23912/2021 (TIT)
BETWEEN
SMT. SUBHAS SHARMILA|W/O SUBASH KUMAR|AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.RESIDING AT NO.5,BAZAR ROAD, VIJAYAPURA,BENGALURU - 560 035.
PETITIONER|
(BY SRI MOHAMMED MUJASSIM, ADVOCATE)
1.INCOME-TAX OFFICER
WARD 6(3)(1),
BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING, |
80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK,NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGEKORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 095.NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGEKORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 095.
2.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX - 6,.
BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING, |8O FEET ROAD, 61TH BLOCK,NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGEKORAMANGALA8O FEET ROAD, 61TH BLOCK,NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGEKORAMANGALA
BENGALURU - 560 095.
3.CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
UNION OF INDIA.
NORTH BLOCK, ~
NEW DELHI - LLOQ OQO
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS |CHAIRPERSON.CHAIRPERSON.
—_ RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 2276 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH_) THIMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 30.03.2021 ISSUED UNDER SECTION|148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 BY THE R-1 WHEREBY THE.R-1 IS SEEKING TO INITIATE RE-ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS|UNDER SECTION 14/7 OF THE ACT 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENTYEAR 2O1L/-L8 AND ALLOW THE SAID RELIEF AND RENDERJUSTICE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo.for withdrawal, whicn reads as follows:
“The petitioner humbly submits the petitioner.has sought for reasons recorded for issuing the.reassessment notice. Hence, the petitioner may|be permitted to withdraw the petition with libertyto challenge the same in the due course, in the|interest of justice and equity.|
3
In light of the same, petition is.dismissed, It is.clarified that the petitioner is entitled to pursue remedy asper law as regards the impugned action of the respondent.
Sd/-|
JUDGE
VP
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.