Wp/24097/2011 Of M/S. Madras Cements Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Sep 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/24097/2011 Of M/S. Madras Cements Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/24097/2011 Of M/S. Madras Cements Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEGODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN. RAVI SHANKAR
WRIT PETITION Nos. 24097 of 2011
Dated: 07-09-2011
Between
M/s Madras Cements Ltd., rep. by itsAsst.General Manager (Legal)Sri T. Mathivanan
And
The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle-3(1)(TDS), SVR Plaza,Vijayawada and another
…Petitioner
…Respondents
Oral Order:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Sri Dwarakanath, learned counselrepresenting Sri K.Raji Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner that inview of the order dated 6-9-2011 of the Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax (TDS), Circle-3 (1), Vijayawada calling upon the petitionerto pay 50% of the demand i.e., Rs.11,32,089/- before 15-9-2011 andfurnish a copy of the challan to the addressor by 19-9-2011; the causein the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No costs.
______________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
7[th] September, 2011
GRR
______________________
N. RAVI SHANKAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue