Wp/24120/2018 Of Mrs. Hogethoppalu Basavaraja Setty Manjula v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
10 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/24120/2018 Of Mrs. Hogethoppalu Basavaraja Setty Manjula v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
2015-2016
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/24120/2018 Of Mrs. Hogethoppalu Basavaraja Setty Manjula v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10[TH|]DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021BEFORE
THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV|
$WRIT PETITION No.24120/2018 (TIT)
BETWEEN
Mrs. Hogethnoppalu Basavaraja Setty Manjula,W/o Mr. Vikram,Aged about 39 years,Residing at Varsha,Opp. Horticulture Office,V.P. Extension,Chitradurga - 577 501.
—. Petitloner|
(By Sri Harish V.S., Advocate)
AND
Tne Income Tax Officer,Ward 1, Tamatkal Road,Medenalil,Chitradurga - 577 502.
.. Respondent|
(By Sri Dilip, Advocate for Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227/ of theConstitution of India, praying to quasn the impugned assessment|order passed by the respondent under Section 143(3) of the|Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 28.12.2017 for the Assessment.Year 2015-16 i.e., Annexure-C and consequential notice of|demand issued by the respondent dated 28.12.2017 for the)Assessment Year 2015-2016, i.e., vide Annexure-Cl.,
This Writ Petition coming on for orders tnis day, the Court,made the following:
ORDER
Petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to|
withdraw the petition with liberty to seek restoration of thepetition, if settlement under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Schemedoes not materialise.
In lignt of the memo filed and submission made,|petition Is.aismissed. Liberty is reserved to seek for|restoration of the petition, if settlement under the Vivaad SeVisnwas Scneme does not materialise.
Sd/-
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue