Wp/24124/2024 Of Janahita Credit Co Operative Society v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(2)(1)

Digitallysigned byVANAMALANLocation:High CourtofKarnataka HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD -WRIT PETITION NO. 24124 OF 2024 (TIT)BETWEEN: JANAHITA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY (A CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY ENGAGED LENDING TO ITS MEMBERS) HAVING ITS BUSINESS AT NO.53 10TH CROSS 2ND MAIN WOC ROAD 2ND STAGE MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BANGALORE 560086 REP BY ITS SECRETARY K N RAMAMURTHY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/A NO.35/1 9TH MAIN 9TH CROSS PARAMILA NAGARA NANDINI LAYOUT BENGALURU 560096 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALRAM R RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(2)(1) BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD HC-KAR 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095 2.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BENGALURU-1 BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD 6TH BLOCK NEAR KHB GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560095 3.THE KARNATAKA STATE CO OPERATIVE APEX BANK REP BY ITS MANAGER NO.191 2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU 560086 …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED NOTICE U/S 226(3) OF THE ACT DTD. 27.04.2024 IN DIN. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1064406408(1) (ANNX-E) FOR THE AY 2011-12; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS BY THEMSELVES BY THEIR SUBORDINATES, SERVANTS OR AGENTS TO WITHDRAW AND CANCEL THE IMPUGNED NOTICE U/S 226(3) OF THE ACT DTD. 27.04.2024 IN DIN.ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1064406408(1) (ANNX-E) FOR THE AY 2011-12; DIRECTION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PROHIBITING AND RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS BY THEMSELVES THEIR SUB ORDINATES, SERVANTS AND AGENTS FROM TAKING ANY ACTION IN FURTHERANCE OR CONSEQUENT TO NOTICE U/S 226(3) OF THE ACT DTD. 27.04.2024 IN DIN. ITBA/COM/F/17/2024-25/1064406408(1) (ANNX-E) FOR THE AY 2011-12 ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "The Advocate for the Petitioner prays that he may be permitted to the withdraw writ petition, since the grievance against which writ was filed, has been addressed and rectified by the Respondents." In the light of the afore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB