Wp/24258/2008 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT HON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICEand HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 24258 of 2008 Between: The Agricultural Market Committee, Enumamula, WarangalDistrict, rep by its Selection Grade Secretary ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), IV 6th Floor, A Block, IT Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad. 3 The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, (Circle-I) Warangal Range, Warangal. 4 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (Circle-I) Warangal Range, Warangal. Range, Warangal. 5 State Bank of Hyderabad, Warangal, JPN Road, Rep by its Branch Manager Branch Manager .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the HighCourt will be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularly on the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the notice dt.29-3-2007 issued to the petitioner market committee and notice dt. 5-10-2007 issued to the several traders issued by the 3rd respondent asillegal and arbitrary and set aside the same Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Sri J.V. Prasad (SC forIncome Tax) The Court made the following : ORAL ORDER:(Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) The learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that thepetition has become infructuous. 2. In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of as havingbecome infructuous with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 6[th] July, 2009ks RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J