Case Law › High Court › Wp/24310/2022 Of M/S Ncell Axiata Limite...

Wp/24310/2022 Of M/S Ncell Axiata Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/24310/2022 Of M/S Ncell Axiata Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2014-15, 2013-14, 2017-18, 2015-16
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/24310/2022 Of M/S Ncell Axiata Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byNARASIMHAMURTHYVANAMALALocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD -WRIT PETITION NO. 24310 OF 2022 (TIT) C/W -WRIT PETITION NO. 24280 OF 2022 (TIT) -WRIT PETITION NO. 24346 OF 2022 (TIT) -WRIT PETITION NO. 24349 OF 2022 (TIT) IN WP NO. 24310/2022 BETWEEN: M/S NCELL AXIATA LIMITED INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2006 (NEPAL) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S.NCELL PRIVATE LIMITED) OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (CFO) MR.ANUPAM BHAT, S/O SHRI MAKHAN LAL BHAT, AGED 57 YEARS, OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMAL SAWHNEY, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M MULLA.,ADVOCATE) NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(2) ROOM NO.430, 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095 REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 01.03.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-A) ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/103113857(1) INITIATING REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR AY 2014-15; QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.05.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-B) U/S 143(3) R/W 147 R/W 144C(3) IT ACT FOR BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTIONAL. IN WP NO. 24280/2022 BETWEEN: M/S NCELL AXIATA LIMITEDINCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2006 (NEPAL) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S.NCELL PRIVATE LIMITED) OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 WARD NO.04, NEPAL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (CFO) MR.ANUPAM BHAT, S/O SHRI MAKHAN LAL BHAT, AGED 57 YEARS, OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMAL SAWHNEY, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M MULLA.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(2) ROOM NO.430, 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095 REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 01.03.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-A) ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1031113867(1) INITIATING REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR AY 2013-14; QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.05.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-B) U/S 143(3) R/W 147 R/W 144C(3) IT ACT 1961 FOR BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTIONAL. IN WP NO. 24346/2022 BETWEEN: M/S NCELL AXIATA LIMITED INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2006 (NEPAL) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S.NCELL PRIVATE LIMITED) OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (CFO) MR.ANUPAM BHAT, S/O SHRI MAKHAN LAL BHAT, AGED 57 YEARS, OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMAL SAWHNEY, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M MULLA.,ADVOCATE) AND: ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.05.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-B) U/S 143(3) R/W 147 R/W 144C(3) IT ACT 1961 FOR BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTIONAL. IN WP NO. 24346/2022 BETWEEN: M/S NCELL AXIATA LIMITED INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2006 (NEPAL) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S.NCELL PRIVATE LIMITED) OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (CFO) MR.ANUPAM BHAT, S/O SHRI MAKHAN LAL BHAT, AGED 57 YEARS, OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMAL SAWHNEY, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M MULLA.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(2) ROOM NO.430, 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 BENGALURU-560095 REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 31.03.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-A) ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1032075147(1) INITIATING REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR AY 2017-18; QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.05.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-B) U/S 143(3) R/W 147 R/W 144C(3) INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTIONAL. IN WP NO. 24349/2022 BETWEEN: M/S NCELL AXIATA LIMITEDINCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2006 (NEPAL) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S.NCELL PRIVATE LIMITED) OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (CFO) MR.ANUPAM BHAT, S/O SHRI MAKHAN LAL BHAT, AGED 57 YEARS, OFFICE AT EKANTAKUNA, NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 LALITPUR METROPOLITAN CITY, WARD NO.04, NEPAL …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KAMAL SAWHNEY, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MOHAMMED SHAKEEB M MULLA.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(2) ROOM NO.430, 4 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, 6 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095 REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001. (BY SRI. DILIP M.,ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 01.03.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-A) ITBA/AST/S/148/2020-21/1031853898(1) INITIATING REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR AY 2015-16; QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 19.05.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-B) U/S 143(3) R/W 147 R/W 144C(3) IT ACT FOR BEING ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT JURISDICTIONAL. NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The question for consideration in these writ petitions would be whether they must stand disposed of in the light of the Division Bench’s order dated 14.07.2023 in ITA No.160/2015 and connected matters and the disposal of similar writ petitions in WP No.51999/2019 connected with WP No.53137/2008 and in WP No.5867/2022 and connected matters in the light of such decision. Sri Kamal Sawhney, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Sri M.Dilip, the learned counsel for the respondents, are heard for final disposal. It remains undisputed that the petitioners, who are the recipients of certain amounts from Indian entities, cannot be subject to assessment if the Division Bench’s order dated 14.07.2023 prevails. However, Sri M.Dilip submits that the order dated NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 It remains undisputed that the petitioners, who are the recipients of certain amounts from Indian entities, cannot be subject to assessment if the Division Bench’s order dated 14.07.2023 prevails. However, Sri M.Dilip submits that the order dated NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 14.07.2023 has been called in question by the Revenue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, and therefore this Court, may not make any observation on the merits of the petitioners’ grounds as against the lack of opportunity or service of due notices. Sri Kamal Sawhney, in rejoinder, submits that in the unlikely event of the Revenue succeeding in its challenge against the Division Bench’s order dated 14.07.2023, the petitioners must be reserved liberty to seek revival of these petitions if these petitions stand disposed of in the light of the Division Bench’s order dated 14.07.2023 and the later disposal of the other similar petitions. These submissions are considered, and this Court is of the considered view that the petitions must stand disposed of quashing the impugned assessment orders as also the penalty orders but with liberty to the petitioners to seek revival of these petitions subject to the outcome of the challenge by NC: 2023:KHC:39250WP No. 24310 of 2022C/W WP No. 24280 of 2022WP No. 24346 of 2022WP No. 24349 of 2022 the Revenue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court as against the Division Bench’s order dated 14.07.2023 in ITA No.160/2015 and other matters as certain other petitioner’s specific grounds are urged. The petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan