Wp/24327/2007 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/24327/2007 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/24327/2007 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of as havingbecome infructuous with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENTHON'BLE SRI ANIL R. DAVE, THE CHIEF JUSTICEand HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO : 24327 of 2007
Between:
The Agricultural Market Committee, Enumamula, Waranal District,Rep. by its Selection Grade Secretary.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IV 6th Floor, A
Block, I.T. Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad.
3 The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Ground Floor, Olympic Bhavan, L.B. Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Hyderabad. Olympic Bhavan, L.B. Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Hyderabad.
4 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (Circle-I), Warangal.
5 The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Warangal Range, Warangal. Warangal.
6 The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Circle-I), Warangal Range, Warangal. Range, Warangal.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the HighCourt will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the ordersin Addl.CIT/WR/Stay/2007-08 dated 9-10-2007 on the file of the 5threspondent is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Section220(6) of Income Tax Act and set aside the same and pass such otherorder or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in thecircumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri J.V. Prasad (SC for Income Tax)
The Court made the following :ORAL ORDER:(Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ)
The learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that thepetition has become infructuous.
2. In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of as havingbecome infructuous with no order as to costs.
ANIL R. DAVE, CJ
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue