Case LawHigh Court › Wp/24394/2003 Of The Income Tax Officer...

Wp/24394/2003 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 12 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/24394/2003 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
12 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/24394/2003 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 24394 OF 2003 12-11-2014 BETWEEN The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 4 (4), 8[th] Floor, Posnett Bhavan, Ramkote,Hyderabad …Petitioner And The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Shapoor House, Adarshanagar, HyderabadBench ‘B’, Hyderabad and another …..Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYAND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 24394 OF 2003 ORDER:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The 2[nd] respondent filed I.T.A Nos.948 to 951/H/2002 before theHyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad (forshort, ‘the Tribunal’) feeling aggrieved by the orders of assessment asconfirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – V, Hyderabad. Hehas also filed Stay Petition Nos.100 to 103/Hyd/2003. The Tribunal passedcommon order dated 30-05-2003 allowing those petitions. The said order ischallenged in this writ petition by the Income Tax Officer. Heard Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counsel for the 2[nd] respondent. Except that the writ petition was admitted on 20-11-2003, no interim order was passed by this Court. More than a decadehas elapsed. By any standard, the appeals may have been disposed of by thistime. Nothing remains to be decided at this stage. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Themiscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition shall also stand disposedof. There shall be no order as to costs. ___________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J 12-11-2014ks ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan