Case Law › High Court › Wp/24621/2002 Of I,T,C. Limited v. The D...

Wp/24621/2002 Of I,T,C. Limited v. The Deputy Commissioer Of Income Tax (Assessments)

High Court 20 Aug 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

20 Aug 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/24621/2002 Of I,T,C. Limited v. The Deputy Commissioer Of Income Tax (Assessments), the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.24621 OF 2002 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order, dated03.09.2002, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘B’ of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in M.P.No.25/Hyd/2001 inI.T.A.No.846/Hyd/1998. It is brought to our notice that the appeal itself was disposed ofby the Tribunal on 30.07.2013. With that, the order in theMiscellaneous Petition ceases to have any independent existence. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Thereshall be no order as to costs. The miscellaneous petition filed in the Writ Petition shall standdisposed of. _____________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. ______________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.