Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2463/2018 Of Sikkim Ferro Alloys Limi...

Wp/2463/2018 Of Sikkim Ferro Alloys Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax Central Circle -1 (4) Mumbai And 3 Ors

High Court 22 Nov 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2463/2018 Of Sikkim Ferro Alloys Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax Central Circle -1 (4) Mumbai And 3 Ors
Date of order
22 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/2463/2018 Of Sikkim Ferro Alloys Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income -Tax Central Circle -1 (4) Mumbai And 3 Ors, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2463 OF 2018 Sikkim Ferro Alloys Limited … Petitioner V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax and ors.… Respondents--- None for the Petitioner. Ms.Shaista Hadi i/by Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Respondents. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 22, 2018. P.C.:- 1.Petitioner has challenged notice of reassessment, the orderof reassessment pursuant to such notice as also the recoverynotices issued by the Department pursuing to the assessment.When the matter was called out, no one appeared for thePetitioner. From the record, however, we gathered that thePetitioner has also filed appeal against the order of assessment.In view of the fact that the Petitioner has already availed thealternative remedy of the appeal, this petition is not entertained. 2 In such appeal all grounds are obviously available to the Petitioner including the ground of invalidity of reassessment. Petition disposed of accordingly. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan