Case LawHigh Court › Wp/24858/2018 Of Sri Vallabhaneni Sudhak...

Wp/24858/2018 Of Sri Vallabhaneni Sudhakar Chowdary v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 08 Jul 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/24858/2018 Of Sri Vallabhaneni Sudhakar Chowdary v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
08 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/24858/2018 Of Sri Vallabhaneni Sudhakar Chowdary v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24858 OF 2018 Between: Sri Vallabhaneni Sudhakar Chowdary,59-7-3A, AcharyaRangaStreet,Ramachandra Nagar, Vijayawada. ...Petitioner AND 1. Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax, Vijayawada1StFloor, SVRPlazaD.No.40-6-15,RevenueColony,SiddarthaPublicSchoolRoad,Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada-520010, AP.D.No.40-6-15,RevenueColony,SiddarthaPublicSchoolRoad,Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada-520010, AP. 2. Director General of Income-tax (Investigation),[3]rdFloor, C R Building,Queens Road, Bangalore-560001.Queens Road, Bangalore-560001.3. ACIT,Circle3(1), Vijayawada, CR Buildings, VPSiddarthaPublicSchool Road, Moghalraj Puram, Vijayawada, AP.School Road, Moghalraj Puram, Vijayawada, AP. 4. ACIT, Central Circle 2(1), Bengaluru, C R Building, Queens Road,Bangalore-560001Bangalore-560001 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to pass an order or direction especially[one][ in][ the][ nature][ of writ]of mandamus holding that the 1®* Respondents order[dated][ 27-11-2017]inF.No. JURISDICTION/PLCIT/VJA/2017-18, passed under[section]127oftheIncomeTaxAct,1961,centralisingthepetitionerscasefrom3rdRespondent at Vijayawada to 4^^ Respondent at Bengaluru as being illegal,arbitrary, burdensome and unsustainable in law apart from being violativeof theratio of the law handed down by this HonbleCourt andHonbleSupreme Court, and consequently quash such order. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the[circumstances]stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings against the Petitioner, pursuant tothe1stRespondentsorderdated27-11-2017inF.No.JURISDICTION/Pr.CITNJA/2017-18,passedundersection127oftheIncomeTaxAct,1961,centralisingthepetitionerscasefrom3rdRespondent at Vijayawada to 4th Respondent at Bengaluru. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A V RAGHU RAM FOR SRI KVASANTKUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA The Court made the following: Order HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAOWRIT PETITION N0.24858 of 2018 ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar) The Writ Petition is filed seeking direction especially[one][ in]the natureof writ of mandamusholdingthat the orderof therespondent No.1videF.No.JURISDICTION/Pr.CITA/JA/2017-18, dated 27.11.2017, passed under Section 127 of the[Income]TaxAct,1961centralisingthepetitioner’scasefromtheRespondent No.3at Vijayawadatothe RespondentNo.4atBangalore,asbeingillegal,arbitrary,burdensomeandunsustainable in law. 2.Todaywhenthematteristakenupforhearing.Sri. A.V. Raghu Ram, learned counsel, appearing on[behalf][ of][ the]learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the[Writ][ Petition][ is]rendered as infructuous.Sri. A.V. Raghu Ram, learned counsel, appearing on[behalf][ of][ the]learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the[Writ][ Petition][ is]rendered as infructuous. 3.Placing the said submission on record, the Writ Petitionisdismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneouspending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. petitions,if any To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRARSECflON OFFICER 1.PrI. Commissioner of Income-tax, Vijayawada1®* Floor, SVRPlaza,D.No.40-6-15,RevenueColony,SiddarthaPublicSchoolRoad,Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada-520010, AP.D.No.40-6-15,RevenueColony,SiddarthaPublicSchoolRoad,Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada-520010, AP. 3.Placing the said submission on record, the Writ Petitionisdismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneouspending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. petitions,if any To, //TRUE COPY// SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRARSECflON OFFICER 1.PrI. Commissioner of Income-tax, Vijayawada1®* Floor, SVRPlaza,D.No.40-6-15,RevenueColony,SiddarthaPublicSchoolRoad,Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada-520010, AP.D.No.40-6-15,RevenueColony,SiddarthaPublicSchoolRoad,Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada-520010, AP. 2.Director General of Income-tax (Investigation), 3^^ Floor, C R Building,Queens Road, Bangalore-560001.Queens Road, Bangalore-560001. 3. ACIT,Circle3(1),Vijayawada, CRBuildings, VPSiddarthaPublicSchool Road, Moghalraj Puram, Vijayawada, AP.School Road, Moghalraj Puram, Vijayawada, AP. 4. ACIT,CentralCircle2(1),Bengaluru, C RBuilding, Queens Road,Bangalore-560001Bangalore-560001 5. One CC to SRI K Vasantkumar, Advocate 6. One CC to SRI Vijay Kumar Punna, (SC FOR INCOME TAX) 7. Three CD Copies svp HIGH COURT DATED:08/07/2024 ORDER WP.No.24858 of 2018?p•1^to2 6 NOV 20?'to\*^ Current Section.*s£^spatch^*»^ THIS W.P. IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS i'
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan