In Wp/2486/2023 Of Uma Devesh Ajmera v. Principal Commissioner Ofincome-Tax Mumbai -2, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPURTIPRASADORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONPARAB
Digitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2023.09.2918:21:29 +0530WRIT PETITION NO. 2486 OF 2023
Uma Devesh Ajmera and Anr.
V/s.Principal Commissioner ofIncome Tax Mumbai – 2 and Ors.
….Petitioners
…Respondents
----
Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Rahul Hakani and Mr. Shashi Bekalfor Petitioners.
Mr. N.C. Mohanty for Respondents-Revenue.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATED : 25[th] SEPTEMBER 2023
P.C. :
1.In view of the order passed by us in Writ Petition (L) No. 13837
of 2023 the impugned orders dated 16[th] March 2023 and 18[th] February 2020
are also hereby quashed and set aside.
2.Petition disposed.
3.All consequential notices/demands issued are also quashed and
set aside.
(NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.