Case LawHigh Court › Wp/24972/2019 Of Sushil Kumar Vaswani v....

Wp/24972/2019 Of Sushil Kumar Vaswani v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 02 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/24972/2019 Of Sushil Kumar Vaswani v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
02 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/24972/2019 Of Sushil Kumar Vaswani v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGHON THE 2[nd] OF DECEMBER, 2022 WRIT PETITION No. 24972 of 2019 BETWEEN:- SUSHIL KUMAR VASWANI S/O LATE SHRI NARAIN DASVASWANI, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCCUPATION:BUSINESSMAN, R/O 10 NIRMAL NURSERY, SANTHIRDARAM NAGAR, BAIRAGARH, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) (BY SHRI RAJEEV MISHRA - ADVOCATE ) .....PETITIONER AND 1.PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2,BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)ADDRESS: INCOME TAX OFFICE, II, III, AND IVFLOOR, METRO WALK BUILDING, E-5, ARERACOLONY, BITTAN MARKET, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) - 462016BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)ADDRESS: INCOME TAX OFFICE, II, III, AND IVFLOOR, METRO WALK BUILDING, E-5, ARERACOLONY, BITTAN MARKET, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) - 462016 2.INCOME TAX OFFICER - 4(4) BHOPAL, (MADHYAPRADESH)ADDRESS: INCOME TAX OFFICE, II, III AND IVFLOOR, METRO WALK BUILDING, E-5, ARERACOLONY, BITTAN MARKET, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) - 462016PRADESH)ADDRESS: INCOME TAX OFFICE, II, III AND IVFLOOR, METRO WALK BUILDING, E-5, ARERACOLONY, BITTAN MARKET, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH) - 462016 (BY SHRI SANJAY LAL - ADVOCATE ) .....RESPONDENTS This petition coming on for admission and I.R. this day, JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU passed the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to avail the statutory remedy available under therelevant statute in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (SHEEL NAGU)JUDGE @shish (VIRENDER SINGH)JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan