Case Law › High Court › Wp/2502/1998 Of Bhel Supervisory Staff A...

Wp/2502/1998 Of Bhel Supervisory Staff Association v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 20 Sep 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

20 Sep 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/2502/1998 Of Bhel Supervisory Staff Association v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINIAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.2502 OF 1998 Date: 20.09.2013 Between: BHEL Supervisory Staff AssociationRegd. No.B-791, Near LIG Sector HospitalBHEL, RamachandrapuramRep. by its SecretarySri Y.B.Arjun And …Petitioner Income Tax OfficerWard 5 (6) TDSAyakar Bhavan, BasheerbaghHyderabad, and five others …Respondents THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINIAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.2502 OF 1998 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini) It is represented by Sri G.Vidya Sagar, learned counsel for thepetitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive foradjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Nocosts. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thisWrit Petition, shall stand closed. ____________ G.ROHINI, J ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date: 20.09.2013Mva

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.