Wp/25649/2022 Of Sri Challam Raju Venkata Seshaiah Choultry v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND .TWENTY FOURPRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25649 OF 2022 Between: Sri Challam Raju Venkata Seshaiah Choultry, Rep. by[its][ Executive][ Officer,]Sri M. Satya Prasada Babu S/o Sambasiva Rao, Samarangam Chowk,[ Park]Road, Vijayawada.520 001. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward No.I (1), Vijayawada. 2.PrincipalCommissioner,IncomeTax,RevenueColony,SiddharthaPublic School Road, Moghalrajapuram, VijayawadaPublic School Road, Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate[Writ][ or]orderor declarationdeclaringthat the order dated07.04.2022of theIncome Tax Officer, Ward No.I(1), Vijayawada, for the Assessment year2015-16bearingDIN/NoticeNo.ITBA/AST/F/148(A)/2022-23/1042643209 (1) under Sec.148A (d) of the Income Tax[Act,] 1961in thematterofSriChallamRaju VenkataSeshaiahChoultry, SamarangamChowk, Vijayawada, (PAN No. ) asarbitrary,illegal,unjustand asin violation of principles of natural justice[and]isliable to be setasided/ quashed and consequently set aside / quash the impugned order dated 07/04/2022 of the Income Tax Officer, Ward No.I (1), Vijayawada,i.:'|he.matter of Petitioner choultry ' i U --3/IaIiQ:il OF 2022 .: :s».7. PetitionunderSection151CPCisfiledprayingthatinthecircumstances statedin the affidavit filedin support of the petition, theHigh Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 07/04/2022 of the1®‘ Respondent herein under Sec.148(A) (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961bearing No.lTBA/AST/F/148(A) / 2022-23 /1042643209 (l)of petitioner SriChallamRajuVenkataSeshaiahChoultry,SamarangamChowk,Vijayawada Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI S.S.PRASAD, SENIOR COUNSEL FORM/s. C.SINDHU KUMARI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA, SC FORINCOME TAX The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::APHC010417442022AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OFFEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOURPRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THETHEhonourable SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.NWRIT PETITION NO: 25649 OF 202^ [3464] Between:RAJUVENKATASESHAIAHSRICHALLAM...PETITIONER(S)CHOULTRY, AND • • •RESPONDENT(S) THE INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS Counsel for thePetitioner(s):SRI. C SINDHU KUMARICounsel for the Respondents: SC FOR INCOMETAX The Court made the following: Sri S.S.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner[submits][ that][ in]view of the subsequent order, detailed order passed[by][ Assesses]in petitioner’s favour.Officer during the pendency of the writ petitionthe cause does not survive to prosecute the petitionin further. Thesamehas been rendered infructuous. the2.Sri Vijay Kumar Punna, learned Standing Counsel forrespondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.isdismissedas3.Recordingthesame,thewritpetitioninfructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- B. PRASADA RAOASSISTANT REGISTRARCJASECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri S.S.Prasad, Senior Counsel 2. One CC to M/s. Sindhu Kumari, Advocate 3.One CC to SR Vijay Kumar Punna, SC for Income Tax 4. Three CD Copies PSR V/ r/ HIGH COURT DATED:22/02/2024 ORDER WP.No.25649 of 2022 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION ASINFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS