Wp/25659/2022 Of Mr Veera Vasant Rao Sanagavarapu v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward No.ii (3)
High Court
11 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/25659/2022 Of Mr Veera Vasant Rao Sanagavarapu v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward No.ii (3)
Date of order
11 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/25659/2022 Of Mr Veera Vasant Rao Sanagavarapu v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward No.ii (3), the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 25659 OF 2022
Between:
Mr Veera Vasant Rao Sanagavarapu, S/o Raghavulu, aged 65 years, R/o 45-17-11, Kummari Bazaar, Gunadala, Vijayawada. 520 004.
...Petitioner
AND
1. The Income Tax Officer, Ward No.II (3), Vijayawada.
2.Principal Commissioner, Income Tax Revenue Colony,[Siddhartha]Public School Road, Moghalrajapuram, VijayawadaPublic School Road, Moghalrajapuram, Vijayawada
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleasedtoissue Writ of Mandamus or any other Writororderordirection declaring that the order dated 08/04/2022 issued by the IncomeTax Officer, WardII (3) Vijayawada for the Assessment year 2015- 16bearing DIN/ Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042658660(1)inrespect of the petitioner having PAN No. , as arbitrary, illegaland asin violation of principles of natural justice, and consequently setaside / quash the same
lA NO:1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
,
pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 08/04/2022 issued bythe l.nso.me Tax Officer, WardII(3) Vijayawada for the Assessment year2^116bearingDIN/NoticeNo.ITBA/AST/F/148A12022-J^1ofe58660(1)inrespectofthepetitionerhavingPAN, Nb.DB^S7429M, pending disposal of above Writ petition’ll
Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI C SINDHU KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUMMA
The Court made the following: Order
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH NUNEPALLY
WRIT PETITION No.25659 OF 2022
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath TUharij
Mr.S.S.Prasad, learned Senior Counsel, assistedbySriChidambaraSastry,learnedcounselforthepetitionersubmits that the petition was filed for declaring the[order/notice]dated 08.04.2022 issued bythe Income Tax OfficerfortheAssessmentYear2015-16.Hesubmitsthatduringthependency of the petition, the order of assessment hasbeen01.03.2024. He submits that in view thereof, thepassed onpetition may be closed.
2.Copy of the order has been placed before us.3.Ms.Iswarya,learnedJuniorStandingCounselrepresentingSri Vijhay K Punna, learned Senior Standing. Counsel for Income Tax Department for the respondents[has][ no]objection.representingSri Vijhay K Punna, learned Senior Standing. Counsel for Income Tax Department for the respondents[has][ no]objection.
4.In view of the aforesaid submission and in view ofthe subsequent development taking place, the writ petitionisclosed.
No order as to costs.
To,
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand closed.
Sd/- B PRASADA RAOASSISTANT REGISTRARSECTIJ'^^FFICER
//TRUE COPY//
1. One CC to SRI C SINDHU KUMARI Advocate
2. One CC to SRI VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA Advocate
3. Two CD Copies
gsg
HIGH COURT
DATED: 11/03/2024
ORDERWP.No.25659 of 2022
WP IS CLOSEDWITHOUT COSTS
oS1Aiii;oCi;!-;\>,ri i^esJCionCo^>PATC
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.