Case Law › High Court › Wp/2569/2013 Of M/S. Cht (India) Pvt. Lt...

Wp/2569/2013 Of M/S. Cht (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors

High Court 04 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/2569/2013 Of M/S. Cht (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax And 2 Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PURTIPRASADPARAB Digitally signed byPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2022.02.0515:19:35 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2569 OF 2013 M/s. CHT (India) Pvt. Ltd. V/s. ….Petitioner Additional Commissioner of Income Tax 8(1) and Ors. ---- None for Petitioner. Mr. Arvind Pinto for Respondents-Revenue. ---- …Respondents CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 4[th] FEBRUARY, 2022 P.C. : 1.Heard Mr. Pinto and consider the impugned order dated 15[th]May, 2013. 2.By this impugned order, the ITAT had rejected the Miscellaneous Application filed by petitioner seeking rectification of an order dated 11[th]July, 2012. We have considered the impugned order with the assistance of Mr.Pinto since petitioner is unrepresented. 3.We do not see any reason to interfere since we do not find anyerror in the order impugned. 4.Petition dismissed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.