Wp/2587/2009 Of Kishormal B. Jain v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax And 5 Ors
High Court
05 Jan 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2587/2009 Of Kishormal B. Jain v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax And 5 Ors
Date of order
05 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/2587/2009 Of Kishormal B. Jain v. Assistant Director Of Income Tax And 5 Ors, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The petition stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2587 OF 2009
Kishormal B. Jain V/s.
..Petitioner.
Assistant Director of Income Tax & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. Vipul B. Joshi i/b. Sameer G. Dalal for petitioner.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
Mr.Uday Sankar Samudrala for respondent No.6.
CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 5TH JANUARY, 2010
P.C. :-
1.At the hearing of the petition, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue states that the application dated 20th October, 2009 filed by the petitioner under section 132-B of the Income Tax Act (Exhibit “H” to the petition) shall be adjudicated upon and a final order shall be passed within a period of ten weeks from today by the competent authority. In view of the aforesaid statement, no further reliefs are sought in the petition.
2.The petition stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue