Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2596/2017 Of Subhash Bhagwatiprasad S...

Wp/2596/2017 Of Subhash Bhagwatiprasad Sharma v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 28(2) And 4 Ors

High Court 18 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2596/2017 Of Subhash Bhagwatiprasad Sharma v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 28(2) And 4 Ors
Date of order
18 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/2596/2017 Of Subhash Bhagwatiprasad Sharma v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 28(2) And 4 Ors, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2596 OF 2017 Subhash Bhagwatiprasad Sharma .. Petitioner v/s. The Assistance Commissioner of Income Tax, 28(2) & Ors. .. Respondents None for the petitioner CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J.J. P.C. DATED : 18[th] JANUARY, 2018. 1.This petition was called out in the morning session, none appeared in support of the petition. It was kept back at 3.00 p.m. 2.At 3.00 p.m. when this petition again called out, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 3.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan