Case LawHigh Court › Wp/25965/2006 Of Smt.thohida Sultana v....

Wp/25965/2006 Of Smt.thohida Sultana v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)

High Court 17 Jan 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/25965/2006 Of Smt.thohida Sultana v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)
Date of order
17 Jan 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/25965/2006 Of Smt.thohida Sultana v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals), the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANARAO WRIT PETITION No.25965 of 2006 Date: 17-01-2007. Between : Smt.Thohida Sultana …..Petitioner And The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Vijayawada& others. …..Respondents. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANARAO WRIT PETITION No.25965 of 2006 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki) The writ petition was filed with a grievance thatapplication for stay pending appeal before the Tribunalwas not being disposed of, as the Member of the Tribunala t Visakhapatnam was on leave. It is stated that theTribunal at Visakhapatnam had become effective as theMember has resumed his duties. As such, the writ petitionis disposed of with a direction to the Tribunal to disposeof the application for stay, expeditiously. _______________ BILAL NAZKI, J 17[th] January 2007. _____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J ajr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan