Wp/26132/2007 Of The Agricultural Market Committee, Suryapet v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)Vi)
High Court
19 Aug 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/26132/2007 Of The Agricultural Market Committee, Suryapet v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)Vi)
Date of order
19 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/26132/2007 Of The Agricultural Market Committee, Suryapet v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)Vi), the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the above statement and having regard tothe fact that no cause would survive for adjudication in thismatter, the writ petition is dismissed. ________________________ Kumari Justice T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI&
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V.SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO : 26132 of 2007
Between:
The Agricultural Market Committee, Suryapet, NalgondaDistrict rep by its Selection Gr. Secretary
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)VI) Aayakarbhavan, IIIrd Floor, basheerbagh, Hyderabad
2 The Income Tax Officer, Suryapet, Nalgonda District.
3 The Sub Treasury Officer, Suryapet, nalgonda Ditrict.
4 The State Bank of Hyderabad rep by its Branch manager
Suryapet, Nalgonda District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of Indiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filedherein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order ordirection more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the notice dated 29-10-2007 issuedunder Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act by the 2ndrespondent herein and given effect to the said notice by the4th respondents is illegal, arbitrary and without anyauthority of law and jurisdiction and set a side the same andpass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court maydeem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.V.N.NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.J.V.PRASAD (SCFOR INCOME TAX)
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI&
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V. SANJAY KUMAR
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)
When this matter has come up, both the Counselsubmitted that the garnishee notice has been withdrawn andtherefore, no cause would survive for adjudication and hence,the writ petition may be disposed of.
Recording the above statement and having regard tothe fact that no cause would survive for adjudication in thismatter, the writ petition is dismissed.
________________________
Kumari
Justice T. Meena
_________________________
Justice P.V. Sanjay KumarDate: 19[th] August, 2008nn/gurc.
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARIand THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.V. SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO : 26132 of 2007 (Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. MeenaKumari)
19/08/2008
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.