Wp/26261/2010 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
19 Sep 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/26261/2010 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
19 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/26261/2010 Of The Agricultural Market Committee v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
W.P.Nos. 26261 & 26271 of 2010.
COMMON ORDER (Per Goda Raghuram, J)
It is represented by Smt. Lalitha, the learned Counsel for thepetitioner; a contention not contested by the learned Standing Counselfor the Income Tax Department, that the impugned notices have sincebeen withdrawn by the 1[st] respondent, the grievance in these writpetitions does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission, the writ petitions are dismissed asinfructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________
GODA RAGHURAM,J
__________________
B.N.RAO NALLA,J
19.09.2011.KRB.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
W.P.Nos. 26261 & 26271 of 2010.
COMMON ORDER (Per Goda Raghuram, J)
Dt, 19.9.2011.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue