Wp/2635/2008 Of M/S. Aramex India Private Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-8(1) And 2 Others
High Court
03 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2635/2008 Of M/S. Aramex India Private Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-8(1) And 2 Others
Date of order
03 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/2635/2008 Of M/S. Aramex India Private Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range-8(1) And 2 Others, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Subject to what is stated above, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2635 OF 2008
WRIT PETITION NO.2635 OF 2008
Aramex India Pvt. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Asstt.Commissioner of Income-tax & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.K.Gopal with Jitendra Singh for petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for respondents.
CORAM : P.B.MAJMUDAR AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 3RD DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The
grievance of the petitioner is that the objection
lodged by the petitioner against the reassessment
notice has not been decided by the assessing officer
and till the same is decided, the proceedings of
reassessment should not be proceeded further.
2. Learned counsel for the department states
that the objection of the petitioner is not yet
decided and till the same is decided, no action will
be taken on the basis of the proposed notice. The
statement of the learned counsel is accepted. The
respondents are directed to take appropriate decision
on the objection raised by the petitioner and till the
- = : 2 : = -
objection is decided, no reassessment proceedings
should be undertaken.
3. We make it clear that we have not expressed
our opinion on the merits of the matter and the
assessing officer may decide the objection raised by
the petitioner in accordance with law, without being
influenced by this order.
4. Subject to what is stated above, the
petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
(P.B.MAJMUDAR
(P.B.MAJMUDARJ.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.