Case LawHigh Court › Wp/26549/2009 Of P. Kasi Visweswara Rao,...

Wp/26549/2009 Of P. Kasi Visweswara Rao, E.g. Dist v. The State Of A.p. Commissioner Of Income Tax & 2 Others

High Court 04 Apr 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/26549/2009 Of P. Kasi Visweswara Rao, E.g. Dist v. The State Of A.p. Commissioner Of Income Tax & 2 Others
Date of order
04 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/26549/2009 Of P. Kasi Visweswara Rao, E.g. Dist v. The State Of A.p. Commissioner Of Income Tax & 2 Others, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

APHC010185592009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAOWRIT PETITION NO.26549 OF 2009 Between: 1. P. Kasi Visweswara Rao, S/o. P. Surya Prakasa Sastry, Hindu, Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District.Senior Civil Judge, Kothapeta, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of A.P., Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry. 2. The Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kakinada Range, KakinadaKakinada 3. The Income Tax Officer, Ward -2, Amalapuram ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: 1.VIJAY KUMAR PUNNA The Court made the following ORDER:(per NJS,J) When the matter was listed on 23.9.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even though the matter is listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J April 04, 2025 vasu ____________________________ TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO,J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan