Case Law › High Court › Wp/26899/2013 Of Andhra Pradesh Foods v....

Wp/26899/2013 Of Andhra Pradesh Foods v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Iii

High Court 21 Jan 2014 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

21 Jan 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/26899/2013 Of Andhra Pradesh Foods v. The Assistant Director Of Income Tax (Exemption) Iii, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not beingpressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No.26899 of 2013 Date: 21.01.2014 Between: Andhra Pradesh Foods, represented by itsManager (Finance), R.Venugopal, Hyderabad .....Petitioner AND The Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemption) III,Hyderabad, and others ...Respondents HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.No.26899 of 2013 ORDER:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does notwant to proceed with the matter. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not beingpressed. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this petitionshall also stand closed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 21.01.2014 Gsn

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.