Case LawHigh Court › Wp/26955/2017 Of Ks R Properites v. The...

Wp/26955/2017 Of Ks R Properites v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) Hyd., And Another

High Court 15 Dec 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/26955/2017 Of Ks R Properites v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) Hyd., And Another
Date of order
15 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/26955/2017 Of Ks R Properites v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) Hyd., And Another, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the request made.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddyand The Hon’ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya LakshmiWrit Petition No.26955 of 2017Date: 15.12.2017 Between: M/s.KSR Properties Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, rep. by its Director Kaka Hari Babu and … Petitioner The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) AC Guards, Hyderabad and another …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Dr.C.P.Ramaswami Counsel for the respondents: Ms.K.Mamata, Sr.SC for Income Tax Dept., The Court made the following: Order: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief: “to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned sanction order u/s.279(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed F.No.CIT(TDS)/HYD/PROS./197/16-17/2017-18 DATED : 07.04.2017 by the 1[st] Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable in law in terms of the provisions of the of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 and quashing the said impugned order, and consequently, to direct the second Respondent not to launch the prosecution u/s.276B read with section 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.” After arguing the case, Dr.C.P.Ramaswami, learned Counsel for the petitioner, requested for permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to his client to avail the remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for quashing of the Criminal Case. The request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is accepted and the Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner in terms of the request made. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, stand disposed of as infructuous. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) Dt: 15[th] December, 2017 lur ________________________ (Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan