Wp/2698/1989 Of Jamna Lal Jaiswal v. Tax Recovery Officer Income Tax Raipur
High Court
25 Apr 2005 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Wp/2698/1989 Of Jamna Lal Jaiswal v. Tax Recovery Officer Income Tax Raipur
Date of order
25 Apr 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/2698/1989 Of Jamna Lal Jaiswal v. Tax Recovery Officer Income Tax Raipur, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
“PSseLenouneeLea EgeFESa errarta Eataaeeeeepera ®nsosagenae—[aemineoo!bf:5 eee UeNASeeeSgeeet)oeiteve[cg]ENT err eee-re|acrooogii2ee2|:Jot—_|||OTN THE HIGH COURT OF HADHYA PEADESH AT JABSALPUR..||(MISC. PETITION wo, 976 J4O50,||| PETITTONER.Jamnalal Jaiswal son of|7|a|-Laxminarayan Jeiswal,agedPo|::Bilaspur.aa|osEEOPOLOEATS.9#1.Tax Recovery Officer,5=:<7) ae) ||Income“<Tax,;Raipur.ine°|7 a_: ved Abe eeLNae raed, —:.;-.;7:3yo } Pieda.“T) tu sonctanatap gustdé a2. Tax Recovery Commissioner,|ooicoeaE Me«.-potim4Poa;1.;.‘oe,iF|islea3,Union of India. TENCueaneibEUSTON,:Brae—;A. — : ~y | by|FHSI5istry JF foneH OR, pr hte ws—ln.|&ve|Dei3_oe|Ts ~PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 207 OF THE GUNSTITUTIO.,eeent nt—_
ns
en
oo!
:
ae
a
oe
a
a
er
7 a
;
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue