Wp/26985/2009 Of Agricultural Market Committee, Adilabad, Rep.by Its v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward
High Court
03 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/26985/2009 Of Agricultural Market Committee, Adilabad, Rep.by Its v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
03 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/26985/2009 Of Agricultural Market Committee, Adilabad, Rep.by Its v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty assought for. __________________________ Justice T.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TENPRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
&
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO :26985 of 2009
Between:Agricultural Market Committee, Adilabad, rep., by its Selection GradeSecretary.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1The Income Tax officer, Ward No.1, Adilabad and others.
.....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI&
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 26985 of 2009
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)
Sri V.V.N. Narayana Rao, learned Counsel for the petitionerseeks permission to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty toreagitate about the issue in case of necessity.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty assought for.
__________________________
Justice T. Meena Kumari
_________________________
Justice Nooty Ramamohana RaoDate: 3[rd] March, 2010nn.
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI
&
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 26985 of 2009
(Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari)
03/03/2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.