Wp/26996/2012 Of Converted Christians Ministries v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/26996/2012 Of Converted Christians Ministries v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/26996/2012 Of Converted Christians Ministries v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of theproceedings dated 31-12-2012 issued by the respondent, thegrievance in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOWrit Petition No. 26996 of 2012Dated: 28-01-2013
Between:Converted Christians Ministries, rep. by itsPresident Ch.Gopal Rao.
AndCommissioner of Income Tax,Guntur.
…Petitioner
…Respondent.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Writ Petition No. 26996 of 2012
Oral order(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
The writ petition is filed for the grievance as to the respondent notpassing orders on the application dated 29-7-2010 in Form 10-G, forgrant of exemption under Section 80-G of the Income Tax Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act’) and seeking a direction to the respondent to passan order expeditiously.
It is represented by Sri B.Narasimha Sarma who has also placeda copy of the proceedings dated 31-12-2012 passed by therespondent, whereby approval has been granted under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act with effect from 29-7-2010.
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of theproceedings dated 31-12-2012 issued by the respondent, thegrievance in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No costs.
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
28[th] January, 2013
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue