Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2728/2013 Of Nishith Madanlal Desai v...

Wp/2728/2013 Of Nishith Madanlal Desai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -11 Mumbai

High Court 04 Feb 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/2728/2013 Of Nishith Madanlal Desai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -11 Mumbai
Date of order
04 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/2728/2013 Of Nishith Madanlal Desai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax -11 Mumbai, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed by IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYPURTI PRASADPURTI PRASADPARABDate: 2022.02.10ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION16:08:50 +053016:08:50 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 2728 OF 2013 Nishith Madanlal Desai ….Petitioner V/s.Commissioner of Income Tax-11 (3) Mumbai And Ors. …Respondents ---- Mr. Firoze B. Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Sameer G. Dalal for Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 4[th] FEBRUARY, 2022 P.C. : 1.Mr. Andhyarujina and Mr. Suresh Kumar state that our findings and conclusions in the order dated 4[th] February, 2022 in Writ Petition No. 2727 of 2013 will cover this petition as well and therefore the court shall grant prayer clause (i) and (ii). Accordingly, this petition is also allowed in terms of prayer clause (i) and (ii) which reads as under : (i) call for record and proceedings and issue writ setting aside and quashing the Impugned Notice dated March 08, 2013 being Ex - ‘I’ issued under section 148 of the Act by the Second Respondent;and quashing the Impugned Notice dated March 08, 2013 being Ex - ‘I’ issued under section 148 of the Act by the Second Respondent; (ii) call for record and proceedings and issue writ setting aside and quashing the order passed by the First Respondent disposing off the objections raised by the Petitioner against the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 18.09.2013, being Ex. ‘K’ hereto;and quashing the order passed by the First Respondent disposing off the objections raised by the Petitioner against the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 18.09.2013, being Ex. ‘K’ hereto; 2.Petition disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan