Case LawHigh Court › Wp/27305/2006 Of Sri Dhanji Ramji Chedda...

Wp/27305/2006 Of Sri Dhanji Ramji Chedda v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Posnet Bhavan

High Court 20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/27305/2006 Of Sri Dhanji Ramji Chedda v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Posnet Bhavan
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/27305/2006 Of Sri Dhanji Ramji Chedda v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Posnet Bhavan, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIAND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.27305 of 2006 Date: 20-03-2007. Between : Dhanji Ramji Chedda. …..Petitioner And The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Hyderabad & another. …..Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIAND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.27305 of 2006 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki)Heard learned counsel for the parties. It is submitted that the grievance of the petitioner hasbeen redressed and a communication by Income-taxOfficer to the Standing Counsel is placed on record. Thelearned counsel for petitioner also submits that hisgrievance has been redressed. Therefore, the writpetition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 20[th] March 2007. _______________ BILAL NAZKI, J ajr _____________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan