Case LawHigh Court › Wp/27307/2003 Of C.p. Chakravarthy v. As...

Wp/27307/2003 Of C.p. Chakravarthy v. Asst. Commissioner Of Incometax Circle 12(1)

High Court 28 Jun 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/27307/2003 Of C.p. Chakravarthy v. Asst. Commissioner Of Incometax Circle 12(1)
Date of order
28 Jun 2004
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/27307/2003 Of C.p. Chakravarthy v. Asst. Commissioner Of Incometax Circle 12(1), the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 27307 of 2003 Between: C.P. Chakravarthy, Hyderabad, being away from India, rep. by Power of Attorney, Shri K.N.Raju. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Asst. Commissioner of Incometax Circle 12(1), Hyderabad. 2 Commissioner of Income-tax A.P.-I, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or directionquashing the notice issued u/s.148 dated 16.7.03 in respect of thepetitioner for the assessment year 2001-02 as arbitrary, illegal,unreasobale and discriminatory. For the Petitioner:MR.Y.RATNAKAR, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr.J.V.Prasad, Standing Counsel for IncomeTax. The Court Made the Following : ORDER: (Per Sri Bilal Nazki, J). Against the order of reopening of assessment, thepetitioner has already filed objections before the assessingauthority-Respondent No.1. Since Respondent No.1 hasnot passed any final order, therefore we dispose of this WritPetition, directing respondent No.1 to consider the objectionsof the petitioner and pass appropriate reasoned order withintwo months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order,before proceeding for re-assessment. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) 28[th] June, 2004. ajr. ___________________(P.S.NARAYANA,J) 1) Asst. Commissioner of Incometax Circle 12(1), Hyderabad. 2) Commissioner of Income-tax A.P.-I, Hyderabad. 3) Two C.D. copies.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan