Wp/27415/2015 Of Ms. Seema Sibbal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Aug 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/27415/2015 Of Ms. Seema Sibbal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Aug 2015
Assessment year(s)
2010-11, 2009-2010, 2010-2011
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/27415/2015 Of Ms. Seema Sibbal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the very same reasons as set out in the order supra, this petition is also accordingly, allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF AUGUST, 2015
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
WRITPETITIONNO.27415OF2015(T-IT)
BETWEEN:
MS. SEEMA SIBBAL W/O. DR.K.W. GOPINATH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.203, ATHENS-1, PRESTIGE ACROPOLIS, HOSUR ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560002.
(By Sri. HARISH V.S, ADV.,)
... PETITIONER
AND
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(3)(1) BANGALORE-560032.
... RESPONDENT
(By Sri. JEEVAN R NEERALGI, ADV.,)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT U/S.143[3] R.W. SECTION 147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961,
DTD.20.3.2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 i.e., ANNEX-G AND CONSEQUENTIAL NOTICE OF DEMAND ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN FORM ITS-7, DTD.20.3.2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11 i.e., ANNEX-H & ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The facts of this case are identical to the facts in WP.NO.27414/2015, filed by the very same petitioner in respect of return of income for the assessment year 2009-2010 which was allowed by order dated 14[th] July 2015.
2. In the present case, facts relate to the assessment year 2010-2011. For the very same reasons as set out in the order supra, this petition is also accordingly, allowed.
Ia
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue