Case LawHigh Court › Wp/2742/1994 Of Dr. Shrikant M. Gosavi v...

Wp/2742/1994 Of Dr. Shrikant M. Gosavi v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2) Nasik

High Court 08 Aug 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/2742/1994 Of Dr. Shrikant M. Gosavi v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2) Nasik
Date of order
08 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/2742/1994 Of Dr. Shrikant M. Gosavi v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2) Nasik, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of in above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2742 OF 1994 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2742 OF 1994 Dr. Shrikant M. Gosavi ...Petitioner. V/s. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), Nashik and Others ...Respondents. Mr.Atul Jasani with Mr.Pramod Vaidya for the Petitioner. Dr.P.Daniel for the Respondent. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 8th August, 2005. J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 8th August, 2005. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that within a period of 4 weeks, the Petitioner will submit their objections with regard to the proposed re-opening of the assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. 3. Dr.Daniel for the Respondent states that if such objections are filed within a period of 4 weeks, the concerned officer will pass a reasoned order within a period of 12 weeks thereafter. : 2 : 4. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in above terms. 5. Issue certified copy. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.) (J.H.BHATIA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan